File Transfer Olympics: Where Does Your Current Solution Rank?

Your file transfer method might secretly be the digital equivalent of a participation trophy. Discover how different approaches stack up in the File Transfer Olympics and why choosing the right champion matters for your business security and compliance efforts.

Welcome to the opening ceremony of the File Transfer Olympics, where various methods compete in the high-stakes arena of enterprise data movement. In one corner, we have the ancient veteran FTP, limping toward the starting line on arthritic knees. In another, email attachments are frantically stretching, already looking winded. Cloud storage services are checking their social media profiles, while SFTP and FTPS look cautiously optimistic about their chances.

And then there’s Managed File Transfer (MFT), walking in with the confident stride of a decorated champion.

Let’s be honest: choosing the wrong file transfer method isn’t just about losing a metaphorical race—it’s about putting your organization at risk of security breaches, compliance violations and workflow disruptions that could cost millions. Let the games begin!

Event 1: The Security Hurdles

In this event, competitors must navigate a series of increasingly difficult security obstacles, including encryption barriers, authentication challenges and vulnerability tests.

FTP: Disqualified Before the Race Begins

Poor old FTP doesn’t even make it to the starting line. The judges immediately disqualify it after discovering it transmits credentials and data completely unencrypted. DQ!

Email Attachments: Trips on the First Hurdle

Email attachments start strong but face-plant spectacularly on the first barrier. Despite TLS encryption between servers, attachments remain the digital weak link—they’re copied, forwarded and stored in countless locations beyond your control.

Not to mention, they’re the preferred delivery mechanism for malware, making them about as secure as hiring a known pickpocket to deliver your wallet across town.

Cloud Storage: A Middle-of-the-Pack Performance

Cloud storage services clear several hurdles with relative grace but stumble when faced with advanced security challenges. While most providers offer decent encryption, security often depends on user configurations.

Their consumer-grade roots show when enterprise-level security features require premium tiers or complex configuration, leaving many implementations vulnerable.

SFTP/FTPS: A Solid But Limited Showing

These security-focused specialists perform admirably, adding the encryption layer that FTP so embarrassingly lacks. They protect data in transit using SSH or SSL/TLS protocols, earning respectful nods from the judges.

However, they lose points for focusing almost exclusively on transit security while neglecting the complete security lifecycle. It’s like having excellent locks on your doors but leaving your windows wide open.

MFT: Clears Every Hurdle with Room to Spare

MFT solutions like Progress MOVEit don’t just participate in the security event—they excel in it. With multi-layered security including encryption, multi-factor authentication, granular access controls and audit trails, MFT treats security as a core design principle rather than an afterthought.

🔐 Security Reality Check: If your file transfer method doesn’t encrypt both data AND credentials, you might as well be posting your sensitive information on a highway billboard. Modern MFT solutions like Progress MOVEit help provide protection for the full file transfer lifecycle.

Event 2: The Reliability Marathon

Image was AI-generated

This endurance test evaluates how consistently each competitor can deliver files across finish lines, even under challenging conditions.

FTP: Collapses at Mile Two

FTP starts the marathon but quickly falls behind, gasping for air, with failure rates estimated at up to 8% even under ideal conditions. When transfers fail, they typically need to restart from scratch—imagine having to return to the starting line every time you trip!

The real costs aren’t just in failed transfers but in the human time wasted monitoring, troubleshooting and manually restarting them.

Email Attachments: Gets Lost on the Course

With email, deliveries frequently vanish into the digital void, trapped by overzealous spam filters or rejected due to size limits—often without notifying the sender. There’s no built-in confirmation system, leaving you wondering if your attachment ever reached its destination, like a letter without a tracking number. Or worse—they’re forwarded to others.

Cloud Storage: Maintains a Steady Pace with Occasional Stumbles

Cloud services generally maintain a decent rhythm throughout the marathon, though performance depends heavily on your internet connection. Synchronization clients sometimes get confused, leading to version conflicts or delays. When they stumble, users have limited visibility into what went wrong or how to fix it.

SFTP/FTPS: Better Endurance Than FTP, Still Hits the Wall

These protocols show improved stamina over their ancient ancestor FTP. Many modern implementations support resuming interrupted transfers, which helps when network gremlins strike. However, they still lack built-in guaranteed delivery mechanisms or automated retry logic, relying on external scripts for these critical functions.

MFT: Crosses the Finish Line Consistently

MFT solutions run the reliability marathon with the consistency of a Swiss watch. They incorporate purpose-built features like automatic retry logic and checkpoint/restart capabilities that allow transfers to resume precisely where they left off after interruptions, and they offer high availability/failover/disaster recovery options.

Event 3: Large File Weightlifting

In this strength competition, contestants attempt to lift increasingly massive files while maintaining good form (speed and efficiency).

Email Attachments: Immediately Disqualified

Email takes one look at the weights and heads for the exit. With typical attachment limits of 10-25MB, email is trying to compete in a heavyweight division with the strength of a hamster. The Base64 encoding it uses actually makes files about 37% larger, further reducing its effective capacity.

Those “clever” workarounds like zip files or splitting attachments across multiple emails? That’s like showing up to a weightlifting competition with scissors to cut the weights into smaller pieces.

FTP: Lifts the Weight, Then Drops It … Slowly

FTP can technically lift heavy weights, but does so with all the speed and grace of a sloth on vacation. Performance over long distances or high-latency networks is painfully slow, with no built-in acceleration technologies to overcome TCP’s limitations. When multiple transfers occur simultaneously, performance degrades even further.

Cloud Storage: Respectable Lifting Capacity

Cloud services show good general strength, handling large files without artificial size limits. Transfer speeds depend on provider infrastructure and your internet connection.

SFTP/FTPS: Strong but Slow

These protocols can handle heavyweight files but share many of FTP’s speed limitations over challenging networks. The added encryption layer, while essential for security, adds some overhead that further impacts performance.

MFT: Olympic-Level Strength and Speed

MFT solutions, like MOVEit software, don’t just lift heavy weights—they make it look easy. Many advanced platforms incorporate specialized acceleration protocols that overcome the limitations of standard TCP, delivering speeds that can be orders of magnitude faster than traditional methods over long-distance or unreliable networks.

Event 4: The Compliance Decathlon

This multi-disciplinary event tests adherence to regulatory standards like HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS and SOX through audit trails, policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting.

FTP and Email Attachments: Escorted Off the Field

Both FTP and email are immediately shown the red card. FTP’s lack of encryption violates virtually every data protection regulation in existence, while its absence of detailed audit logs makes it impossible to track who accessed what and when.

Email attachments create a data governance nightmare. Once sent, files can be forwarded anywhere, stored everywhere and accessed by anyone, making compliance with data retention and access control requirements fundamentally impossible.

Cloud Storage: Inconsistent Performance Across Disciplines

Cloud services show variable results depending on the provider and tier. While some offer compliance certifications and basic audit capabilities, the responsibility for correct configuration falls heavily on the customer. Achieving comprehensive compliance typically requires significant administrative effort and vigilance.

SFTP/FTPS: Passes Basic Security, but Fails Governance

These protocols clear the encryption hurdle but stumble badly in the governance and auditing portions of the event. Standard implementations often lack the detailed, tamper-evident logging and policy enforcement capabilities necessary to satisfy auditors or demonstrate regulatory compliance.

MFT: Compliance Champion

MFT solutions were seemingly built with the compliance decathlon in mind. They provide thorough, tamper-evident audit trails documenting every system interaction. They enable centralized policy enforcement for security rules, access controls and data retention schedules. Purpose-built reporting capabilities help generate the documentation auditors demand, while the unified management framework supports control over sensitive data throughout its lifecycle.

The Medal Ceremony: And the Winner Is …

Image was AI-generated

As our File Transfer Olympics conclude, the final standings reveal a clear hierarchy:

Gold Medal: Managed File Transfer

Excelling across all disciplines with a robust, integrated approach to security, reliability, performance and compliance.

Silver Medal: Secure Protocols (SFTP/FTPS)

A significant security upgrade over FTP, but lacking the enterprise features, automation capabilities and governance framework needed for true excellence.

Bronze Medal: Cloud Storage Services

User-friendly for simple sharing but with inconsistent enterprise capabilities, requiring careful selection and configuration for business-critical uses.

Participation Ribbons: FTP and Email Attachments

Outdated, insecure and unreliable—these methods might have dominated the 1990s Olympics, but they’re dangerously inadequate for today’s challenges.

Taking Home the Gold: Your Action Plan

1. Evaluate your current methods against the four Olympic criteria: security, reliability, performance and compliance.
2. Identify high-risk transfers involving sensitive data or critical business processes.
3. Test a modern MFT solution like Progress MOVEit software, to experience the difference in security, reliability and ease of use.
4. Develop an implementation roadmap prioritizing your most vulnerable or valuable transfers.
5. Measure the ROI in terms of reduced risk, improved compliance posture and operational efficiency.

The File Transfer Olympics may be a fun way to frame the comparison, but the stakes in the real world are extraordinarily high. By choosing a gold-medal solution like MOVEit MFT, you’re implementing better technology that helps transform how your organization protects and leverages one of its most valuable assets: its data.

Is your organization still competing with outdated equipment, or are you ready to train for gold?

Get Started with MOVEit